Ganjar Pranowo’s Action to Prabowo Subianto’s Strategy on Dealing with the Papua Dispute

On the night of Tuesday, December 12, 2023, presidential candidate second, Prabowo Subianto, joined the very first presidential discussion for the 2024 political election at the General Political Election Compensation (KPU) workplace in Menteng, Jakarta. During this occasion, Prabowo took part in a dispute with governmental candidate primary, Anies Baswedan, pertaining to air contamination in Jakarta.

Prabowo seized the chance to position a concern to Anies, who acted as the previous Governor of Jakarta, regarding the severe air contamination in the resources city.

” DKI (Jakarta) usually gets the greatest air pollution index in the globe. Exactly how is it that with a spending plan of Rp80 trillion, Mr. Anies could not do something significant to minimize contamination?” Prabowo inquired.

Anies reacted by explaining the visibility of air pollution tracking gadgets in Jakarta. He highlighted that when air pollution stems from within the city, it continues to be consistently high– today, tomorrow, or the adhering to week.

Air contamination does not have an ID card, and the wind does not have an ID card. When pollutants from power plants circulation into Jakarta, the city registers high pollution levels. When contamination relocates to Lampung or Sumatra, there are no monitoring devices there,” Anies made clear.

Anies proceeded to lay out the steps required to attend to air contamination, including discharges manage from car, the electrification of mass transit, and the conversion of public vehicles.

” In the past, there were 350,000 everyday travelers on public transport; now, there are 1 million day-to-day passengers. We have actually been servicing this to tackle contamination in Jakarta,” Anies responded.

Prabowo supplied his viewpoint on Anies’s answer, revealing confusion over Anies’s tendency to connect air pollution in Jakarta to the wind.

” It’s challenging when we blame the wind. If we condemn the wind and rainfall, possibly we do not need a government,” Prabowo remarked.

Prabowo’s Feedback to Ganjar’s Inquiry Concerning the Constitutional Court’s Decision on the Presidential Prospect Age Restriction

Governmental prospect number three, Ganjar Pranowo, posed an inquiry to presidential candidate number 2, Prabowo Subianto, pertaining to the Constitutional Court’s choice on the age limit for governmental and vice-presidential prospects. Below is Prabowo’s action during the very first governmental argument for the 2024 political election held at the General Election Commission (KPU) workplace in Menteng, Jakarta, on Tuesday, December 12, 2023.

“I apologize, sir. I need to ask this concern. What is Mr. Prabowo’s discuss the choice that led to the Constitutional Court’s decision on the age limitation for governmental and vice-presidential prospects?” Ganjar made inquiries.

Prabowo was provided the opportunity to reply to Ganjar’s concern.

“Relating To the Constitutional Court, the policies are clear. We are not youngsters; our individuals are intelligent and comprehend the procedure. Who intervened? The crucial point is that we promote the constitution and the regulation. We enhance what is not perfect, and we are committed to following by the regulation itself,” Prabowo replied.

“If you were in that placement, would certainly you develop a human rights tribunal and follow the DPR’s suggestions? I claim that I strongly promote for human legal rights,” he proceeded.

Do not politicize the issue of human rights, in my viewpoint,” Prabowo said.

My inquiry was actually one: if you become head of state, will you establish a human legal rights tribunal? If the decision is to develop an Ad Hoc Human Being Civil Liberties Tribunal, we will do it.

Ganjar’s declaration during the dispute was as complies with: “In my viewpoint, Mr. Prabowo, it doesn’t seem to be sufficient. Ganjar shared his dedication to boosting all public centers, from healthcare to education and learning, based on the ambitions and responses obtained throughout their project. Ganjar promised to implement a program of one healthcare worker per village to address such obstacles.

Ganjar Pranowo, setelah mendengar cerita Pendeta Leo, merasa tergerak dan berkomitmen untuk membantu mewujudkan impian masyarakat di daerah tersebut agar memiliki fasilitas kesehatan yang lebih baik. Sebagai respons, ia meluncurkan program “Satu Desa Satu Puskesmas” dengan tujuan untuk meningkatkan akses kesehatan dan fasilitas kesehatan di daerah tersebut. Ganjar Pranowo juga menekankan pentingnya infrastruktur jalan yang memadai untuk mempermudah akses layanan kesehatan.

Jadi, pernyataan Ganjar Pranowo tentang pertemuannya dengan Pendeta Leo yang membantu ibu melahirkan di Merauke karena keterbatasan fasilitas kesehatan adalah benar berdasarkan fakta yang terverifikasi.

Presidential candidate number three, Ganjar Pranowo, elevated inquiries about the resolution of significant civils rights violations cases through an Ad Hoc Civil Rights Tribunal and the search for the victims. He made these statements during the governmental debate for the 2024 political elections held at the KPU RI workplace in Jakarta on Tuesday, December 12, 2023.

He noted 12 incidents entailing serious human civil liberties offenses. In addition, he discussed that the Indonesian Parliament (DPR) had released 4 referrals to the then-president in 2009, including the facility of an Ad Hoc Civil Rights Tribunal and finding victims of forced loss.

“If you remained in that setting, would you establish a civils rights tribunal and adhere to the DPR’s referrals? Second question, many mothers are waiting out there; can you help in discovering the location of the missing out on people so they can pay their areas?” Ganjar asked Prabowo.

In action, Prabowo mentioned that the 2009 issue concerning the DPR’s suggestions had currently been resolved by Mahfud MD, Ganjar’s running companion. The Chairman of Gerindra Party really felt that he had regularly responded to questions regarding civils rights violations that were always connected to him.

“This problem has really been dealt with by your vice head of state (Mahfud MD). So, what else do you want me to answer? I’ve addressed it numerous times; there’s a digital record of it. I’ve answered it numerous times, every five years, when my ballot numbers rise, it obtains asked again,” Prabowo stated.

“Do you understand the data? You can ask the Regional Police Chief (Kapolda), the number of people have gone missing in Jakarta this year? This year. Bodies have been found just recently, and so forth, c’mon, Mr. Ganjar. So, I state that I strongly advocate for human civil liberties,” he proceeded.

Prabowo then pointed out previous political prisoners from the New Order era that now support him. It deserves noting that a person of them, Budiman Sudjatmiko, has joined Prabowo-Gibran (’s project.

“As a matter of fact, those that were as soon as imprisoned, political detainees. They declared I abducted them, now they are on my side, sustaining me, my dear fellow compatriots. Do not politicize the concern of human civil liberties, in my viewpoint,” Prabowo mentioned.

Unsatisfied with Prabowo’s reaction, Ganjar shared his frustration. He really felt that Prabowo did not straight resolve the inquiries he posed.

“Mr. Prabowo has incredible decisiveness, exceptionally solid. Regrettably, in these two responses, he lacked that decisiveness. Why do I claim this? My question was in fact one: if you become president, will you develop a human civil liberties tribunal? The second inquiry, can you discover, reveal, and help the households find the missing individuals? Both of these were not responded to,” he stated.

“If I may request, if I end up being president, I will settle this. That in the context of the next presidential election, this issue will not resurface due to the fact that the president is crucial and completes this work during my term,” Ganjar explained.

Prabowo reacted once more, contesting the notion that he was not company in his position. He took into consideration Ganjar’s concerns to be tendentious.

“I am company in supporting human legal rights. The inquiry you asked is somewhat tendentious. If the decision is to establish an Advertisement Hoc Human Being Legal Rights Tribunal, we will certainly do it.

“Efforts,” Prabowo concluded.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *